Category: Events

  • The organ that raises: Marialuisa Veneziano charms Falconara

    By Claudia Valenti

    Marialuisa Veneziano
    (©Emiliano Tarsetti)

    A rough and moving evening, in which the music of Morandi, Bach, Guilmant and Liszt became a gesture of beauty, solidarity and community.


    Falconara Marittima (An), 9 June 2026

    ***

    You should ask yourself sometimes what you really want a crowd when filling a church to listen to an organ.

    Certainly not the noise, of which the world is already prodigal dispenser; not light leisure, which is born and dies with the same hurry; not the vanity of being there, because there are places in which also vanity, if it enters, is forced to lower the voice. On the evening of June 6, in the Church of Sant’Antonio da Padova of Falconara Marittima (An), a very numerous community — a full church, indeed filled, as rarely happens for an organ concert — seemed to look for something more ancient and more necessary: a reason to listen together.

    And that reason came with the first sound.

    It wasn't a simple start. It was as if the air, until that moment immovable, suddenly found a soul. The organ took voice and the church, which was already full of people, seemed to fill itself only then. Because there are tools that accompany thought, and others who call it to judgment. The organ belongs to the latter. He does not ask for distraction, does not give superficiality: he takes the silence of men and measures it.

    At the instrument, Marialuisa Veneziano, organist, pianist and musicologist, interpreter of rare intensity, able to combine a powerful technique with an even more difficult quality to find: the inner necessity of sound. He did not play to adorn the evening, nor to please the audience, nor to exhibit that mastery which also appeared evident from the early jokes. It sounded like those who know that every note, if not born from a truth, remains only a note; and that music, when it is not called to say something of man, becomes a useless luxury.

    The concert was promoted to Caritas, with the support of President Ondina Valeria Ghergut and the Franciscan friars community of the parish. And it is not a detail to put at the bottom, among the obligatory thanks. It is, on the contrary, the moral key to the evening. Because beauty, when she meets charity, stops being isolated contemplation and becomes work. And the Franciscan friars, with that laborious simplicity that often makes more than many proclamations, have opened the doors not only of a sacred building, but of a possibility: to show that a community can still gather around what it elevates.

    From left: the parish priest Father Leon, Marialuisa Veneziano, Marina Mancini
    (©Emiliano Tarsetti)

    To present the concert was Eleonora Tarsetti, and those who had careful eyes would immediately understand that his was not an ornamental presence. There are people who announce them only; others, instead, generate them before they even begin. Eleonora belongs to this second species, more rare and more precious. His voice, measured and participated, brought with him the silent story of a strong, operous friendship, not exhibited. A friendship that believed, organized, supported, prepared the way. Next to her, Marina Mancini has contributed with kindness and grace to lead the public through the evening, as those who accompany without ever oversight, offering to the words the discreet measure of the welcome. This also gave the concert a special tone: not the cold one of the official occasions, but the rarest one of the evenings treated with a light hand, in which every intervention prepares listening and invites the public to enter, step by step, in the deeper meaning of the event.

    Between Eleonora Tarsetti and Marialuisa Veneziano we felt that connection that does not need many statements, because it speaks through gestures. And in times when talent is not always kept — sometimes it is looked suspiciously, as if the light of others was a decrease in its own — It is good to see a friendship that does the opposite act: it does not turn out, does not hold, does not measure; it opens. Eleonora Tarsetti opened a door. And from that door that night, the music passed.

    Marialuisa Veneziano at the organ and Eleonora Tarsetti
    (©Emiliano Tarsetti)

    The program was not a sequence of songs, but a moral itinerary.

    With Giovanni Morandi and his Offer, the organ showed its Italian face, clear, cantabile, almost smiling in its composure. There was on that page a simple, not poor grace; a luminosity capable of combining the sacred measure with a more human, almost theatrical breath. Marialuisa Veneziano made it with finesse, without limestone, without weighting, letting the sound walk in the church as a morning light. It was the right beginning: not the inruption of the sublime, but its announcement.

    Then Bach came. And when Bach really enters a church, he never enters as a guest. Get on the ground.

    The Touch and escape in minor king (BWV 565), so famous to be often consumed by habit, that evening he found his original severity. It was not the "famous" page that the public recognizes with satisfaction; it was a call. The Toccata has torn the space with a force that seemed musical and moral together. The Escape, then, recomposed that shock in order, voice after voice, as if chaos was called to give reason for itself.

    Here the Venetian Master showed an extraordinary mastery. The organ technique, in its complexity of hands, feet, registers, sound balance and control of acoustics, was safe, clear, dominated. But the real merit was another: that technique did not ask to be admired. Served. He claimed. He was carrying. It was like a column hidden inside a building: who looks admiring the time, but the time would not hold without that column. Thus it was the virtuosity of Venice: not vanity, but architecture.

    In Bach, his interpretation took the breath of the necessary things. Every voice of escape seemed to advance with its own dignity, and all together they built that miracle that only Bach does so naturally: transforming thought into emotion without betraying either one or another. The church listened real. And there are immobilities worth more than many applauses.

    With Alexandre Guilmant and the Symphonie n°1 in D minor by organ, the speech became wider. The organ has assumed symphonic dimension, almost orchestral. Not only liturgical instrument, but sound world: imaginary brass, invisible arches, luminous masses, deep shadows. French writing demanded greatness, but greatness is a dangerous matter: in less experienced hands it becomes weight, rhetoric, noise. Venetian, however, has been able to breathe. The sound widened without overturning; it climbed without crushing; it filled without confusing.

    It was, that, one of the moments in which the nature of the interpreter was better understood: a musician capable of power, but not in love with power; able to make the space tremble, but without losing the modesty of detail. And the smell, in art, is not weakness. It is the custody of greatness.

    Finally Franz Liszt.

    Here the evening entered a harsher, more burning, almost prophetic region. The Präludium und Fugue über It is not only a tribute to the genius of Eisenach: it is a struggle with the name, with the memory, with the inheritance, with that absolute that Liszt pursued throughout his life, now with the impetus of the virtuoso, now with the restlessness of the penitent. On this page the music is not limited to proceeding: search, question, rush, go back. Marialuisa Veneziano has entered there without satisfaction. He did not make Liszt an exercise of skill, although the difficulty was evident and very high. He made a play of it. Every passage seemed to bring with it a question: what remains of man when he entrusts his name to music? What remains of pain when it is transformed into form? What remains of fatigue when it becomes beauty?

    In Liszt, the artist appeared in his fullness. Not only the performer from the safe technique; not only the scholar who knows the internal structure of the songs; but the interpreter who risks something of himself. There are correct executions, there are brilliant executions, and then there are executions that seem to have gone through a life before arriving to the public. The Venetian one belonged to this last category. He didn't just produce sound: he delivered it.

    And the audience, in a church now almost a single being listening, received.

    It could be said that applause was warm, and that would be true. One could say that participation was great, and it would still be true. But there are smaller truths, and for this reason more revealing. One of these happened when, in the still vibrant silence after music, a very young voice shouted:

    "Brava prof!"

    You cannot invent a better phrase. No critic, no presenter, no release could have said more with so little.

    "Brava prof!": two words only, but inside there was the whole evening seen from the eyes of a young man. There was the affectionate amazement of those who recognize, in their teacher, not only the daily figure of the school, but the artist capable of shaking a church. There was the tenderness of a generation that, when it is not educated only to noise, still knows how great it is. There was evidence that music, when it is true, does not remain closed in titles and skills: it also comes there where technical language does not serve, because it speaks the heart.

    That cry didn't break the silence. He did.

    He entered the solemnity of the evening a simple, clear, irresistible note of life. And perhaps it was at that moment that the concert showed its deepest meaning: not to separate the top from the daily, but to unite them. Bach and school. Liszt and affection. Caritas and virtuosity. The Franciscan friars and the crowd. The friendship of Eleonora and the voice of a boy. Everything, for a moment, together.

    Marialuisa Veneziano during the execution (©Emiliano Tarsetti)

    This is the power of music when he meets a community: he reassembles what life often divides.

    The evening of 6 June had, in fact, a beauty not only artistic, but civil. Caritas, President Ondina Valeria Ghergut, Franciscan friars and those who made the event possible remembered that solidarity is not only an answer to the emergency, but an education of the gaze. Help also means creating places where man can feel part of something again. A church full for an organ concert is not only a success of public: it is a sign. And the signs, when they are honest, are worth more than the statements.

    In this sign, Eleonora Tarsetti had the discreet and decisive role of those who know how to recognize before others. But to say only this would be little. There are people who do not come to life to occupy space, but to return it; not to ask for light, but to allow others not to be afraid of it. Eleonora, in this evening, was exactly this: a presence able to believe without intruding, to support without holding, to prepare the way without pretending to be the way.

    Not all friendships are generative. Some consulate, others accompany; the highest, however, make things happen. They are those friendships that see when the world distracts, that guard when others disperse, that do not return before the greatness of the other because they do not live it as a threat, but as a gift. At a time when too many energies are consumed to resize, contain, extinguish what exceeds the common measure, a friendship that promotes beauty becomes almost a countercurrent act.

    Eleonora did this: she believed in a light and prepared her space. He realized that a concert could become something more than a musical evening; he could become a meeting, charity, memory, recognition. He brought his care within the organization of the event, but above all he brought that rare form of trust that does not need clamor to be decisive. Because sometimes the greatest things do not arise from those who raise their voices, but from those who know how to say, with firmness mild: "this beauty must happen".

    So the concert became more than a concert. He became a small parable about recognition.

    And in the middle of this parable remains the figure of Marialuisa Veneziano. An artist who does not ask for indulgence, because he possesses the tools of rigour; but who does not take refuge even in rigour, because he knows that art without soul is only well dressed discipline. Its execution has combined precision and fire, control and abandonment, thought and vibration. He made the organ not a monument, but a living creature.

    There was, in his way of playing, something we could call responsibility for beauty. Every song seemed brought to the public not as personal possession, but as a gift. Morandi with his grace; Bach with his ordained abyss; Guilmant with its solemn breadth; Liszt with his spiritual fever. Each page became a stage, and each stage allowed not only the composer, but also the interpreter: his culture, his strength, his history, his ability to transform fatigue into form.

    When the last vibration dissolved, the church did not immediately return to normal. No place returns identical after being crossed by a necessary music. The walls seemed to hold something again; the faces of the public brought that particular light that appears when you received more than you expected.

    Then what happens in true evenings cannot be commanded or predicted: the public stands.

    The applause, already long and grateful, has become a full, warm, almost liberating standing ovation. Not only the tribute to a successful execution; was the recognition of something that had touched deeper. The viewers did not applaud only the technique, although extraordinary, nor only the strength of the songs: applauded the experience lived, the emotion received, the feeling of being carried by hand into a higher place.

    And precisely in the final greetings, when an artist could easily take refuge in the pride of success, Marialuisa Veneziano chose instead the most difficult and brightest way: that of humility.

    He thanked the public with simple words, but capable of moving. "The artist without the public is nothing, because music does not live in the solitary gesture of those who perform it, but in the encounter with those who welcome it. Music needs humanity, people willing to listen, to get excited, to recognize each other through sound."

    It was a moment of rare truth.

    After Bach, Guilmant and Liszt, after the power of the organ and the intensity of the evening, those words brought everything back to its purest root: the music does not belong to the artist as a possession, but passes through the artist as a gift. And a gift exists only when someone receives it.

    The standing ovation, then, is no longer just an applause standing, but an answer. The audience returned to the artist what he had received; and the artist, with humility, handed back to the public the very meaning of music. In that dialogue without score, made of hands, shiny eyes and gratitude, perhaps the deepest meaning of the evening has been fulfilled.

    And perhaps this is the right word: gratitude.

    Recognize towards Caritas and friars, for making the church an open house. Recognize towards Eleonora Tarsetti, for believing and building. Recognize towards Marina Mancini, for having guided the public with grace and kindness through the passages of the evening. Recognize towards the public, for having filled not only a space, but a silence. Recognize to that young man who, with his "Brava prof!", delivered his most innocent and true phrase to the evening. Finally, she recognizes Marialuisa Veneziano, for having remembered that music, when born from study, pain, faith and dedication, can still perform the most difficult miracle: to make men feel less alone.

    We do not know if everyone, coming out of the church, has been able to accurately say what they had heard. Perhaps some will have appointed Bach, others Liszt, others the power of the organ, others still the full church or the emotion of that young cry. But it is not always necessary to give a name to the things that change. Sometimes you just take them away.

    On June 6, in Falconara, many entered the church for a concert.

    They came out with a memory.

    And memory, when it is made of beauty, friendship and charity, resembles a form of grace.

    Leave a comment

  • Marialuisa Veneziano, when the organ becomes breath of the soul


    SABATO 6 JUNE 2026 TO THE CHURCH OF SANT’ANTONIO FROM THE MARITTIMA FALCONARA PADOVA, A SERATA IN CHOSE THE GREAT ORGANISTICAL REPERTORIO INCONTRAL SOLIDARITY, THE FRANCE SPIRITUALITY and the SILENTIAL FORZA SILENZIOSA OF AMICIZIA.

    The concert poster Saturday 6 June 2026

    By Claudia Valenti


    Falconara Marittima, 3 June 2026

    The organ is not an instrument that simply sounds. It is a tool that you cross. He needs hands, of course, of feet, of study, of control, of a very strict technique; but above all he needs a vision. Because the organ, more than any other instrument, gives nothing to the surface: it amplifies what the interpreter is. If there is empty inside, it returns empty. If there is thought, it returns architecture. If there is soul inside, then the sound becomes destiny of the air.

    On June 6th, at the Church of Sant’Antonio da Padova in Falconara Marittima, the public will be able to listen to the Maestro Marialuisa Veneziano, organist, pianist, musicologist, cultural journalist and music diffuser, in a concert born from the encounter between art, spirituality and solidarity.

    Marialuisa Veneziano is a rare artist: graduated in Piano at the Conservatory "Santa Cecilia" in Rome, built over time a path in which interpretation, research, writing and dissemination are never separate compartments, but parts of a same vocation. He played in contexts of particular prestige, even on occasions linked to the spiritual and institutional life of the Church, including moments connected to the pontificates of Benedict XVI and Pope Francis. The concert career has accompanied an intense musicological, journalistic and educational activity, until the foundation and direction of the cultural title "Le Apeiron", a place of reflection on music, art and thought. But what strikes, meeting it, is not only the resume. It is the not common understanding of humility and artistic greatness. Venetian speaks of music with almost religious respect, but without rigidity; with deep culture, but without satisfaction. He is an artist who knows the hard discipline of study and together with the human fragility that every true interpretation brings with it. Its organistic technique, solid, refined, able to govern with gloss keyboards, pedals, logs, sound planes and acoustic complexity of the instrument, is never performed as fine virtuosity to itself: it becomes a means to dig, to say, to illuminate. The concert on June 6 will also be a community gesture. Behind the evening is the work of those who believed in the value of an event capable of combining beauty and concrete participation: Caritas, pr

    On the eve of the concert, we met Marialuisa Veneziano for a real, intense conversation, sometimes surprising, in which the musical program becomes an opportunity to talk about art, friendship, faith, resistance and personal destiny.

    • Teacher, the concert on June 6 was born in a community: Caritas, President Ondina Valeria Ghergut, the Franciscan friars of the Parish. What's the value for you?

    It has a huge value, because a concert so it never comes from one person. Of course, then on the instrument I am, with my responsibility, my study, my way of breathing inside the music. But first there is a network of people that makes the meeting possible. Caritas, Ondina president and the Franciscan friars community have done something deeply beautiful: they believed that a musical evening could become a gift for the falconian community. They made available not only a space, but a trust, a care, a rare availability. And when a religious and solidarity community opens its doors to music, it is not simply hosting an event: it is saying that man also needs beauty to remain human. I feel very grateful. The Franciscan friars carry with them an idea of simplicity and essentiality that moves me. St. Francis spoke to creation, poverty, light and the last. And at the bottom of the music, when it is true, does something like this: it does not impose, does not scream, but reaches. It comes where words often fail to arrive.

    • Often behind a concert there is not only the work of the artist, but also a silent plot of trust, meetings and friendships that make the event possible. How important is it for you to know that someone recognizes the value of an artistic project and chooses to promote it?

    It matters a lot, because a concert never arises only when the artist sits on the instrument. It was born much earlier: from trust, from intuition, from someone who looks beyond the surface and understands that an artistic project can become an opportunity for beauty, meeting and good. In this path, Eleonora Tarsetti had a fundamental role, a person deeply linked to the parish reality and the falconarean community, who believed in the strength of this musical proposal. It was she who realized that an organ concert could not only be an event cultural, but a moment of recollection, sharing, opening to the city. He recognized a possibility and chose to take care of it, with discretion, care and determination. Here, for me this word is decisive: recognize. We often live in environments where talent is not accompanied, but supervised; where competence is not valued, but resized; where light bears are sometimes invited, with a lot of education and little size, to lower the flame not to disturb the surrounding darkness. There are working realities that should nourish people and instead consume them; places where we talk a lot about collaboration, but we practice too often the subtle art of shutting down. For this, when you meet someone who does the opposite gesture — that does not turn out, does not diminish, does not fear, does not hold — you feel almost physically the difference. Eleonora did this: he saw, believed, opened a road. He did not ask the music to regret to remain in a mediocre measure; he wanted, on the contrary, that it could reach the community in its fullness. There are people who come to life not making noise, but moving something. They do not enter with great proclaims, they do not promise seas and mountains: they simply see. And when a person really sees you, especially when you struggle to recognize yourself entirely, he does a huge gesture. Because being seen does not mean being praised: it means being understood in one's own truth. In an artistic path you study so much, you work so much, you fall, you get up. You also learn to resist those environments where quality is accepted as a threat instead of as a wealth; to those contexts where who knows how to do is often looked with suspicion, as if preparation He doesn't ask you to continually prove who you are. She recognizes you. And that recognition becomes a home. Eleonora, in this concert, was also this: not only a friend, not only an organizational presence, but a person capable of transforming trust into action. He believed in me, he proposed to me, worked for the idea to take shape and arrive at Caritas, the Franciscan friars community, parish, people. He did all this with a care that does not belong to simple efficiency, but to something more rare: love for what is built. For me this is a very high form of friendship: do not hold the other in the shadows, but accompany it towards the light. Don’t just say "I’m close to you," but make sure that what the other brings inside can meet the world. True friendship does not level, does not envy, does not fear the greatness of others. True friendship can say: "Go, this must live." That's why this concert also bears its invisible name. Not as an official signature, perhaps, but as a deep presence. Because there are events that are realized thanks to programs, permissions, spaces; and then there are events that are realized because someone, first of all, has been able to say: "it is worth it". I'm grateful for opening a door. And certain doors, when they are opened by a true friend and a person who loves their community, do not only lead to a concert: they lead to a greater form of shared destiny. In the end, perhaps, the most beautiful sense of this evening is also here: show that where any

    • The organ is an imposing, almost superhuman instrument. What is your personal relationship with this tool?

    It is a relationship of love and fear. Fear in the noblest sense: respect, threshold, dizziness. The organ is not a tool you can possess. You can study it for years, you can know the technique, you can govern hands and feet, you can work on phrasing, recording, form; but in the end each organ remains a new encounter. Each instrument has a character, a voice, a resistance, a secret. And every church still transforms it. With the piano the sound is born under the fingers. On the other hand, the sound is also born elsewhere: in the air, in the reeds, in the space, in the distance between you and what comes back. You press a button and the sound answers you from another point, as if it comes from a larger area than you. For this reason the organ continually educates me to humility. Remember that it's not enough Good. You have to listen. You have to wait. You have to understand when to drive and when to let yourself be guided.

    Marialuisa Veneziano at the organ
    • The public often imagines the organ as a severe, liturgical, distant instrument. Is the evening program gonna try to break this idea?

    Yes, very much. The organ is certainly linked to the liturgy, spirituality, the great sacred tradition. But reducing it to this would be like looking at the sea and saying that it is just water. The organ can be monumental, but also intimate. It can have the power of an entire orchestra and, a moment later, the delicacy of a solo voice. It can evoke prayer, but also dance; it can be theatre, meditation, fire, shadow, joy. The program is thought like a journey between these possibilities. I don't want the audience to witness a sequence of songs like a showcase. I would like you to enter a story: every music page will be a room, a landscape, a different question.

    • Is there an existential question that music asks her every time she sits in the instrument?

    Yes. "What are you really looking for? " I think every artist, sooner or later, has to answer this question. It is not enough to look for applause, it is not enough to seek perfection, it is not enough to seek recognition. They're human things, of course, but they can't be the center. When I sit at the organ, especially in a sacred place, I feel that the question is more radical. Looking for beauty? Am I looking for truth? Am I looking for consolation? Am I trying to turn something into a sound that can also speak to others? Music puts you in front of yourself. You can't lie too long. Sooner or later the sound reveals everything: your strength, your fear, your discipline, your wounds, your faith in life. Maybe that's why I keep looking for her. Because music doesn't allow me to become superficial.

    • She possesses an organ technique of great solidity, but in her interpretations it seems that the technique never wants to show itself. What is the relationship with virtuosity?

    The technique is indispensable. Without technique there is no freedom, there is only intention. And the intention alone is not enough. The organ requires huge control: hands, feet, logs, instrument response times, acoustics, voice balance. It is a wonderful and complex machine. We must have clarity, coordination, mental resistance, precision. But the technique, if it remains end to itself, becomes gymnastics. I think the highest virtuosity is what disappears within the meaning. The audience may not think: "how difficult is what you're doing." You must feel that difficulty has become an expression. The technique is like grammar of a language: necessary, but no one moves for grammar alone. It moves when that grammar becomes poetry.

    • In your path you also knew obstacles, resistances, attempts to resize. Was music also a form of defense?

    More like a form of truth. The defense sometimes stiffens; the truth instead stands. Every person who does something seriously encounters, sooner or later, those who try to diminish, to soil, to remove light. It's part of life, though it shouldn't. But the important thing is not to become like what hurts us. I think serious work has a louder voice than noise. Those who try to break someone often forget something simple: if a person has deep roots, not Just shake a little wind to drop it. And if art is authentic, sooner or later it finds the way to speak. I prefer to respond with the studio, with music, with quality. It is a form of elegance, but also of survival. The organ, in this, is a great teacher: it does not discuss with noise. It's high.

    • She is also musicologist, cultural journalist and divulner. How much does it matter to tell the music, as well as to play it?

    It matters a lot. Music needs to be heard, but also accompanied. Not because the audience is not able to understand, but because every listening can become deeper if someone opens a door. Divulge does not mean simplifying until trivializing. It means making complexity accessible without betraying it. I always thought culture shouldn't be on a pedestal. He has to go down among people, not to lower himself, but to raise everyone's gaze. Music is a form of thought. It teaches us time, wait, relationship between the parties, silence. In a society that consumes everything quickly, educating to listen is almost a revolutionary act. And maybe even therapeutic.

    • Having played in important places and occasions, also linked to solemn moments of the Church, what changes when playing in a local community?

    It doesn't change responsibility. In fact, sometimes it increases. Playing in prestigious contexts is certainly exciting. These are experiences that mark, which remind you of the greatness of a tradition, the symbolic weight of certain places, the history that passes through music. But a local community has something equally valuable: proximity. Falconara won't play for an abstract audience. I'll be honored for people who live that territory, that parish, that community. People who will perhaps enter with the labors of the day, with their stories, their worries, their hopes. And music will have to talk to them, not to an ideal idea of audience. This is beautiful for me. Because the great music does not belong only to the great stages. It belongs to every place where someone is willing to listen to it.

    • What would happen in the audience during the concert?

    I'd like a little inner shift to happen. Not necessarily something clamorous. Sometimes the most true transformations are silent. I wish someone, listening, would find a forgotten thought. Let someone else feel a form of peace. That someone else would go out and say, "I didn't think the organ could talk to me like this." Authentic music does not invade. Work inside. Deposit. Continue after the last note. And perhaps the most beautiful concert is not what ends with an applause, but what continues in the memory of who was there.

    • If you were to define the concert on June 6 with an image, what would you choose?

    An open door. A door opened by Caritas, President Ondina, Franciscan friars, Eleonora, the community. A door through which music can enter and exit, because beauty should not be held. It must be shared. And then an inner door. Because the organ, when it resounds in a church, seems to open something above us, but also within us. It reminds us that we are not only meant to run, defend, produce, endure. We are also made to listen, to move, to recognize us in something bigger.

    The concert on June 6 is therefore announced as much more than a musical appointment. It will be an evening in which the falconareus community will be able to meet a thick artist, capable of combining culture, technique and human intensity; but also a woman who, behind the solidity of the path and the strength of interpretation, preserves an increasingly rare quality: the humility of those who know that music never belongs entirely to those who perform it.

    In M° Marialuisa Veneziano live the rigor of the performer, the depth of the scholar and the passion of the disseminator. But, above all, there emerges an obstinate fidelity to beauty. A faithfulness that does not ignore the difficulties, crosses them. He doesn't deny pain, he transforms it. It does not respond to noise with other noise, but with a higher note. And maybe this is the strongest message of the evening: music, when born from a true need, is never decoration. It is a form of spiritual resistance. It is the way a community gathers, a friendship becomes gesture, a cause finds voice, and an artist delivers not only his talent to the public, but the clearest part of his history. On June 6, in the Church of St. Anthony of Padua, the organ will not only be heard. He'll be inhabited. And, at least for one evening, his breath will become the breath of all.

    Leave a comment

  • From the night of conscience to the light of mercy. Verdi's Requiem in the sign of Dante and Manzoni

    From the night of conscience to the light of mercy. Verdi's Requiem in the sign of Dante and Manzoni

    Saturday 28 March 2026, 2 hours1 – In the historical hall of the Teatro dell’Aquila di Fermo, the FORM – Orchestra Filarmonica Marchigiana, together with the Regional Choir ARCOM and the young musicians of the "Rossini" Conservatories of Pesaro and "G.B. Pergolesi" of Fermo, retrace under the direction of Manlio Benzi the great path of the soul that Verdi entrusted to his Requiem.

    by Marialuisa Veneziano


    «God never troubles the joy of his children except to prepare them for a more certain and greater.»
    — Alessandro Manzoni

    If the human soul was a land to be crossed, there would not be only bright plains and gentle slopes, but also sudden ravines, shadow valleys and cliffs from which the gaze struggles to detach. And it is perhaps from one of these inner cliffs that seems to be born Mass by Requiem by Giuseppe Verdi. Not as a peaceful music, not as a liturgy that goes down already consoled from above, but as a cry that rises from the depth of man, crosses the terror of judgment and slowly, almost with hesitation, seeks the way of mercy. Those who have had the opportunity to listen to her live know well that unique impression it produces: it is not only about attending a concert, but to take part in an experience that resembles a moral journey. So it was also in the performance of Saturday 28 March 2026 at the Teatro dell’Aquila di Fermo, where the FORM – Orchestra Filarmonica Marchigiana, enriched by students of the Conservatories "Gioachino Rossini" of Pesaro and "Giovanni Battista Pergolesi" of Fermo, together with the Regional Choir ARCOM and the quartet of the soloists Yulia Tkachenko, Mariangela Marini, Davide Giusti and Alessandro Abis, under the direction of Manlio Benzi, gave rise to an intense reading of this score that, at a distance of one hundred and fifty years, continues to question man more than comfort.

    The Requiem was born in 1874 to commemorate Alessandro Manzoni. Greens, who was not prone to literary idolatry, nourished for the Lombard writer a veneration that aroused devotion. When he heard about his death, he wrote to the editor Remember words that reveal a seldom confessed emotion: «With him disappears one of the purest splendours of our glory». Now, those who are familiar with Verdi's temperament know how alien the composer was from all rhetorical sentimentalism; and yet that loss struck him as one gets hit when a figure disappears, which, despite not belonging to his own daily intimacy, represents a kind of collective moral consciousness. Manzoni had been, for many Italians of the nineteenth century, something like this: not only an author, but an ethical point of reference. It is not surprising that Verdi’s tribute was not just a musical commemoration, but a work of extraordinary spiritual complexity.

    And here, if you look carefully, a consonance emerges that is not only literary but almost philosophical. The history of human consciousness — they knew well thinkers like Blaise Pascal or Søren Kierkegaard — is always suspended between two abyss: that of despair and that of faith. The man, writes Pascal, is «a thinking rod»: fragile in his matter, immense in his consciousness. The Requiem Verdiano seems to be born from this condition. We do not find a faith proclaimed with theological security, but a conscience that is questioned. Not a dogma, but a drama. In this sense Verdi’s music is surprisingly approaching the Manzonian vision of human moral history. In Wedding promises, the conversion of the Unknown represents perhaps one of the most profound moments of European literature: a man who, coming on the edge of the abyss, suddenly discovers that mercy can exist. It is exactly the same spiritual movement that crosses the structure of the Requiem.

    This tension is already evident in the first lines of the Requiem aeternam. The entrance of the choir has nothing of the solemn proclamation: it is rather a breath, a prayer that is almost shy. The arches accompany with a suspended delicacy, as if the music itself feared to disturb the silence from which it emerges. Here Verdi demonstrates an extraordinary theatrical wisdom: faith does not appear as certainty, but as desire. The ARCOM Choir has returned this atmosphere, albeit with a pronounced shyness of female voices, keeping the sound suspended in an almost metaphysical dimension.

    But who believed that this calm represents the definitive face of the Requiem He would soon be denied. Just wait a few minutes for the entire musical building to be shaken by one of the most impressive pages in the history of music: Dies. Here Verdi seems to want to evoke not only the day of judgment, but the moral earthquake that it represents for human consciousness. The brass explode with almost apocalyptic violence, the choir enters as a compact mass and the orchestra turns into a feverish organism. Many scholars have observed how this page possesses something profoundly Dante, and the reference to Dante Alighieri does not appear at all arbitrary. In the sound turbine of Dies it seems to glimpse the storms of Dante’s Hell, those souls overwhelmed by forces that can no longer govern.

    But here there is also a deeper philosophical question. Judgment, in Christian tradition, is not only an eschatological event: it is also a metaphor for consciousness. Every man carries his own inner court. Immanuel Kant talked about «moral law within me and starry sky above me». Verdi, without any explicit philosophical claim, seems to transform this idea into music. The Dies It is not only the divine judgment: it is the moment when man is suddenly faced with his own truth.

    Incipit of Dies Irae, by Requiem

    The FORM has faced this moment with energy and compactness, supported by the enthusiasm of the students of the conservatives of Marche who have joined the teachers of the regional ensemble. But what was most striking was not only technical precision or sound power, but that rarer quality that could be called collective musical consciousness. The orchestrals of the FORM seemed to breathe together, as if each instrumental gesture was part of a greater thought than the individuality. In philosophy it would be said that here the individual is done in the community: not the sum of isolated musicians, but a living organism, able to transform the individual gesture into shared language. And this is one of the most silent miracles of orchestral art. The bows, compact and intense, possessed that timbre depth that allows green music to never become merely sound rhetoric; the brass, powerful but not brutal, sculpted the acoustic space with the almost liturgical dignity that this score requires; the woods, with their most intimate nuances, remembered that even in the heart of musical storms there is always a more fragile and more human inner voice.

    The direction of Manlio Benzi has favoured a vibrant and theatrical reading, highlighting the dramatic dimension of Verdi's writing. If you would like to make a critical remark — and criticism, when it is sincere, must always maintain its freedom — some times of Dies Perhaps they could have adhered even more deeply to the narrative monumentality of the mature Green, which tends to sculpt terror with an almost sculptural gravity.

    The choir, throughout the work, plays a role that goes far beyond that of simple sound mass. Verdi uses it as a sort of collective consciousness of humanity. In Quantus tremor est futurus writing assumes an almost declaiming character, as if the whole human species spoke with one voice in front of the unknown of the final judgment. The ARCOM Choir has shown here a compactness and clearness of remarkable joints.

    In the Confutatis maledictis the drama takes on an almost theatrical form. The bass Alessandro Abis authoritatively pronounces the condemnation of the wicked, while the orchestra responds with a restless plea. Verdi builds this passage on a clear contrast between the serious and the acute register, between the sentence and the prayer. It is one of those moments when his operatic experience emerges strongly: the composer knows perfectly how to transform a theological concept into a musical gesture of immediate effectiveness.

    Among the most moving pages emerge then the Lacrimo, where the invocation appears Save me, fons pietatis. Here music suddenly changes color. The melodic line of the soloists stretches with an almost disarming sweetness, as if the consciousness, after contemplating the abyss, finally found the strength to beg. But Verdi is not limited to this: it lets the choir enter over that melody, slowly, as a wave that wraps and exceeds the individual voice. The result is one of the most intense moments of the entire score. The solo quartet has found here a particularly successful balance: the soprano Yulia Tkachenko with a bright and penetrating line, the mezzo-soprano Mariangela Marini with a warm and deep timbre, the tenor Davide Giusti with a clear and well projected vocality and the bass Alessandro Abis with a strong timbre authoritativeness.

    And when, after so many storms, the Pie Jesu, music finally seems to breathe. It is a simple, almost childish supplication, which asks mercy more than justice. Here the parallel with Manzoni becomes almost inevitable: as the Unknown who, after the night of conscience, discovers the possibility of forgiveness, so the Requiem Verdiano seems to arrive at a dimension of hope.

    But Verdi does not give an easy conclusion. In Free me, Domine the solo soprano is back in front of the theme of Dies, returning as a shadow of memory. It is an extraordinary dramatic gesture. The composer does not erase the fear of judgment: he recalls it, reproposes it, almost to suggest that human consciousness can never get rid of it completely. Yet, through the final prayer, that fear seems to turn into something different: no more terror, but awareness.

    And at that moment — while the choir suspends its voice between imploration and silence and the orchestra seems to hold the last breath — something happens that no musicological analysis can really explain. One has the feeling that that prayer no longer belongs to the Latin text, neither to Verdi's score, nor to the performers on stage. It becomes a question addressed to each of us. Not a question cried, but almost whispered, as happens in the most intimate hours of consciousness: if indeed, beyond the tumult of life and our fears, there may be a mercy capable of accepting man as it is, fragile, imperfect, but irreparably human.

    When the last sound dissolved in the hall of the Teatro dell’Aquila, the audience remained for a few moments suspended in that silence that follows only the great musical experiences. Verdi, with his disarming irony, once said: «I don't know. Requiem be sacred or theatrical; I know only that it is true». And maybe this is the truth. — human before even religious — to make this work one of the leaders of Western music: a journey that, starting from the barter of conscience, stubbornly attempts to find the way to heaven.

    30 March 2026

    Photo © Elisa Prague

    7–11 minutes

    Leave a comment

  • Hell as a mirror of man: the cinematographic Dante of Matteo Gagliardi.

    Hell as a mirror of man: the cinematographic Dante of Matteo Gagliardi.

    A cinematic reading of Hell that returns the philosophical depth and moral modernity of the Comedy.

    by Marialuisa Veneziano


    Ancona 25 March 2026, DanteDí

    On March 25, the date that tradition recognizes as the beginning of the journey of Divine Comedy, Italy celebrates Dante, a national day dedicated to the Supreme Poet. It is not a purely commemorative occasion: it is rather an invitation to return to Dante as a source still alive of our thought and language. In this symbolic and cultural context, the vision of the film by Matteo Gagliardi is inserted with particular strength, a work that attempts — with awareness and respect — to return to the contemporary public the intellectual and poetic energy of Dante’s Hell.

    Approaching Dante's Hell means measuring one of the most vertiginous moral and poetic architectures of Western civilization. It is not simply a poem, nor an allegorical narrative: Hell is a philosophical construction of human responsibility, a topography of the soul in which every penalty is the necessary consequence of a choice. Transposing this universe into cinematic language inevitably entails a risk: to reduce symbolic complexity to pure visual representation.
    The film by Matteo Gagliardi shows a rare awareness of this challenge. His Dante is not treated as a monument to be illustrated, but as a living text to be questioned. The director seems to understand that Hell is not as much a place as a structure of thought: the place where Dante testes man’s freedom and his tragic ability to self-determinate in evil.

    It is known that Dante’s Hell does not work as a simple catalog of sins. Each damned man represents a tension of the human brought to the extreme consequences. Francesca da Rimini is not only the adultererer transformed by passion: it is the tragedy of love that confuses its justification with fatality. Ulysses is not only the hero of knowledge: it is the symbol of intellectual hybris that claims to exceed the limits of the human condition. Ugolino is not only the figure of revenge: it is the terrible image of despair that devours itself.
    In this sense, the greatness of Hell does not reside in punishment, but in the psychological clarity with which Dante looks at his characters. It does not reduce them to moral examples; it lets them speak. And while they speak, they reveal the drama of human freedom.

    Gagliardi's film shows that he understands this deep dimension of the poem. He does not try to spectacularize Hell, but to return the character of universal human drama. The direction maintains a delicate balance: on the one hand the philological respect for the Dantesque word, on the other the awareness that cinema must translate that word into sensitive experience.


    It emerges a Dante who preserves his original strength: that of a poet able to look at evil without stopping questioning man.
    Moreover, the same structure of Hell reveals the modernity of Dante’s thought. The infernal circles are not only levels of punishment: they are a progressive descent into the deformation of reason. We start from the uncontrolled passion, we go through violence, we finally reach fraud and betrayal. The more human intelligence is used to deceive and dominate, the more guilt becomes serious. It is an ethical concept of extraordinary modernity, which focuses on the responsibility of the individual.

    In this context, Dante's journey is not only an ultra-terrestrial itinerary. It's a cognitive path. Hell becomes the place where the poet learns to recognize the truth of human passions. Only through evil can one understand the need for salvation.

    Gagliardi's film is able to return this pedagogical and philosophical dimension of the poem, showing how Dante continues to speak to contemporary sensibility. In an age that often perceives classics as distant objects, cinema can become a tool capable of reopening dialogue with that tradition.

    This is where the cultural value of the work is grasped. It is not simply about telling Dante, but to return the urgency.
    Because Dante, in the end, does not write only for his contemporaries. He writes for every age that he wants to question the fate of man. Hell is the place where humanity contemplates its possibility of falling, but also its ability to understand itself.

    It is no coincidence that one of the highest moments of the poem is in the voice of Ulysses, when the desire for knowledge turns into a challenge to the human limit:

    "You did not live like brutes,
    but to follow virtute and canoscence. "

    It is the verse that perhaps best summarizes the intellectual tension of the entire Commedia: the dignity of man lies in the search for knowledge, but that research must remain aware of its boundaries.

    In this sense, the cinematographic Dante of Matteo Gagliardi succeeds in an uncomplicated task: to bring the viewer back into the great moral question that crosses the poem. Not so much what Hell is, but what man becomes when the sense of responsibility is lost.

    And it is precisely this question to make Dante still necessary.

    Because, as the poet writes at the beginning of his journey, every human existence knows sooner or later the moment of dismay:

    Dante Alighieri

    "In the middle of the cammin of our lives
    I found myself for a dark forest. "

    The merit of works like that of Gagliardi lies in reminding us that the wild does not belong to the Middle Ages.
    It still belongs to our conscience.

    Leave a comment

  • Family concert in Senigallia (An): the FORM between magic, story and awareness

    Family concert in Senigallia (An): the FORM between magic, story and awareness

    From the enchanted chaos of "The Sorcerer Entrepreneur" to the narrative clarity of "Pierino and the Wolf": a Family Concert of FORM that transforms listening into experience and the boys into interlocutors of music.

    Senigallia, 22 March 2026


    by Marialuisa Veneziano

    Before the music begins, there is always a fragile and precious moment in which everything is still possible.

    The lights hesitate, the caterpillar gets thinned, the theater holds the breath without declaring it. It is a time suspended, almost imperceptible, yet decisive: there we measure the quality of what is about to happen.

    At the La Fenice Theatre in Senigallia, on Sunday, March 22, that moment had a particular density. It wasn't just waiting. It was helpful. Children prostheses towards the stage, children gathered in unexpected silence, families immersed in a quiet vigilant. Not a distracted audience, but an audience already listening before the sound was born.

    And that changes everything.

    Because when listening precedes music, music must not conquer: it can happen.

    Many of those guys didn't get empty. They brought with them traces, previous encounters, sedimented insights. And so, from the first moment, what has been created has not been a simple relationship between who performs and who receives, but a relationship. A silent dialogue, ready to sound.

    When the FORM – Orchestra Filarmonica Marchigiana – took place, led by the measured gesture of Jacopo Rivani, the concert — in a way — had already begun.

    And when the first note crossed the hall, he did not find spectators.

    He's got careful consciences.

    It was a Family Concert. But in this definition there was no reduction: there was an opening. An act of trust. The idea that music, even in its complexity, can be inhabited by all — if you only create the right space.

    The apprentice who loses control, Pierino who gives a face to the sound: the music between vertigo and conscience.

    Then the journey began.

    With "The sorcerer apprentice".

    And now the music has made itself a gesture.

    An apprentice who dares too much, a formula that escapes, a broom that comes to life. The water that rises, which grows, does not stop anymore. But what makes this story so powerful is not history — is the way it is thought.

    Paul Dukas builds the song as an organism that feeds itself. A minimal rhythm cell creeps into the orchestra and begins to proliferate. It repeats, expands, multiplies until it loses any possibility of control.

    The broom is not an object.

    It's a principle.

    A rhythm that becomes destiny.

    The bows put it in motion, the wood chases it, the brass amplify it until it becomes overwhelming. The orchestration does not describe the action: it generates it, pushes it, makes it inevitable.

    And in this process there is a truth that goes beyond music: what we do not know how to rule grows to dominate us.

    In this tension so alive, so proruptive, interpretation has chosen a more contained, more guarded way. The times, sometimes retained, have favoured clarity with respect to urgency, carefully returning what in Dukas' writing also lives and necessarily excess, almost feverish momentum.

    And yet, precisely in this choice, the orchestra has shown considerable solidity. The sound was compact, the sections dialogue accurately, the sound planes were legible. A less overwhelming reading, perhaps, but aware, able to make intelligible, despite everything, complexity.

    And the boys — exceptionally — They were inside all this.

    They followed. They recognized. They were guessing.

    They didn't get the music. They lived there.

    Then, when the flow reached its limit — when chaos showed itself in its fullest form — the story has turned.

    He didn't stop.

    It's clear.

    He went in "Pierino and the wolf."

    And suddenly, the music took face.

    With Sergei Prokofiev, every sound becomes identity. The flute flies light in the bird, the oboe waves in the duck, the clarinet moves furitive in the cat, the phagotto leans heavily in the grandfather, the horns open the shadow of the wolf.

    And Pierino — the arches — He's not just a character.

    It's a balance.

    Lucia Palozzi's acting voice fits with intelligence, as a discreet thread that binds without stringing. He didn't explain: he accompanied. He didn't translate: he let it emerge.

    And something rare happened.

    The boys smiled before the sound was done. They were anticipating. They connected.

    The cat is there.
    The wolf is coming.
    The bird is already flying.

    It was no longer a concert.

    It was a recognition.

    And in that recognition something profoundly educational was accomplished.

    Because culture is not what is explained.

    That's what you recognize when you meet him.

    And here then the bond, powerful, inevitable, between the two tracks.

    In the first, music is growing matter, energy growing, strength escaping.
    In the second, that same matter is organized, clarifies, lets itself be appointed.

    It is the passage from chaos to form.

    From experience to understanding.

    From vertigo to consciousness.

    And this — more than anything — is the heart of pedagogy.

    The Filarmonica Marchigiana supported this path with professionalism and coherence, building a sound that did not seek the effect, but the sense. And in this, also the direction of Rivani — in his choice of containment — has maintained the thread of the speech, favoring readability, structure, clarity.

    Then we understand.

    It wasn't just a concert.

    But an experience.

    Of those that do not consume when they happen, but continue to work inside.

    In the end, applause was not just a sign of enthusiasm.

    They were an act of awareness.

    As if the audience knew they had received something that didn't run out.

    A rhythm that continues to turn.
    A sound that remains.
    An image that does not dissolve.

    Because music, when he really meets the listener, doesn't end.

    Deposit.

    And from there — slowly slowly — It starts to turn.

    Leave a comment

  • When culture changes its voice: the day Montemarciano listened to his boys.

    A journey between sound, matter and history led by young people: culture as a daily exercise, not as a simple event, on the occasion of FAI Days, 21 and 22 March 2026.

    By Marialuisa Veneziano


    Montemarciano, 21 March 2026

    There are afternoons that do not happen: they turn out.

    They do not come as events, but as slow, almost shy revelations, in which everything seems to wait for their moment to say something essential. And when it happens, you notice — with a bit of wonder — that what you are experiencing is not only a set of activities, but a form of beauty that takes body.

    At the Alfieri Theatre in Montemarciano, culture had an unexpected face.

    The guys.

    The children, pupils of the I.C. Montemarciano – Monte San Vito: small ciceroni in the afternoon FAI

    They weren't there to learn. They were there to return.

    There was, in their gestures and in their words, something extremely rare: an awareness still young, but already able to voice. The students of the second and third classes of the Montemarciano-Monte San Vito Institute welcomed the public not as simple guides, but as temporary guardians of a heritage that, for an afternoon, passed through them.

    And in this passage something profoundly beautiful happened.

    Because when culture is alive, it is not transmitted: it entrusts itself.

    A full, sincere praise, almost necessary at a school that has managed to make the most difficult gesture: to leave space. Believe that boys are not only recipients, but possible source of sense. It is a choice that not only produces learning, but forms looks, and looks — when they learn to see — change the world.

    Next to this vision, the Municipality of Montemarciano moved with that elegant discretion that belongs to those who really understand the value of things. He did not simply organize: he created conditions so that something could happen. And in this gesture, silent but decisive, we recognize a high form of cultural responsibility.

    The route opened without declaring itself.

    A voice — that of a boy, and then another — and immediately the music.

    But not the music you listen to.
    The one you see.

    The collection of historical clarinets by Andrea Greganti appeared as a constellation of suspended forms, objects that did not ask to be admired, but included. The clarinet, a young instrument in history and yet already loaded with nobility, was shown in its original restlessness: a continuous search for balance, perfection and identity.

    Some historical clarinets exhibited in the foyer of the Alfieri Theatre

    He was not born accomplished.

    It was built over time, through errors, attempts, corrections. And in this evolution something profoundly human is seen: the stubborn desire to find a voice that is, finally, proper through the technical improvement of materials and mechanics.

    Among the instruments, one — almost with smell — the so-called thermosiphon clarinet. A mild, domestic name, yet capable of enclosing a surprising intuition. An air chamber inside a metal stem, designed to heat the instrument in a short time through the insufflation of the musician, to make it immediately ready to sound.

    And in that technical detail there was a wider truth.

    That nothing that vibrates is born without being prepared.
    That sound, before it exists, needs care.

    This is where culture stops being surface and becomes thought.

    And once again, we understand how precious the gesture of the Municipality of Montemarciano has been: to make accessible what is normally kept, to allow a community to enter into a rare intimacy. It is not only openness: it is trust.

    Then, seamlessly, something even subtler happens.

    The matter is allowed to cross.

    Thanks to the collaboration with the Polytechnic University of Marche, clarinets are observed through micro-TAC: a technology capable of penetrating the interior of objects without violating them, revealing its hidden structure. It is as if the look learned a new form of depth.

    Computerized demonstration of the internal study of the instrument

    You can see cavities, thicknesses, invisible lines that make the sound possible.

    And then it is understood that beauty is never only what appears.
    It is always what it supports.

    And the boys — still they — to guide this gaze inside the invisible, with a simplicity that does not impoverish, but illuminates.

    Then the passage becomes more intimate.

    In the Little Theatre, light changes, time slows down, and history enters.

    But he doesn't come in as a story.

    Enter as a presence.

    Alfonso Piccolomini takes shape through an essential sketch, almost restrained, and precisely for this powerful. Duke of Montemarciano, figure marked by the complexity of his time, by the tensions, by the choices that are not simplified.

    There is no celebration.

    There is return.

    And in this return something rare is done: history is not softened, but respected. The boys walk through it without fear, they live there, they make it alive. And at that moment we understand that educating does not mean protecting from complexity, but offering tools to support it.

    Once again, the school is revealed for what can be when it is authentic: a place where knowledge turns into consciousness. A full, deep praise to an institution that is not limited to teaching, but chooses to form.

    And next door, always, the Municipality. Consistent presence, able to support a vision that does not divide, but unites. Because what has been seen is not the sum of three activities, but a single gesture: to relate.

    And yet, just when everything appears harmonious, a question emerges — not as critical, but as desire.

    That all this does not remain an island.

    That does not run out in the short time of a successful afternoon. Because culture, if it really wants to be such, cannot live with apparitions. It must become practice, habit, daily breath.

    And here the school returns, again, to the center. Not only as a place that participates, but as a place that prepares. Prepare to see before I even know. Prepare to recognize the value of what is near before looking for it elsewhere. Prepare to connect, in a time that divides.

    Music, history, science — not as compartments, but as dialogue.

    In an age that too often educates to survival and forgets the sense of beauty, teaching to see becomes a necessary act. Almost an act of resistance.

    And here, for an instant, this possibility has become visible.

    In the end, leaving, there was a subtle feeling.

    Not to have seen anything.
    But they were crossed.

    As if culture, for an afternoon, had chosen to pass by hand.

    And her hands were young.

    That's exactly why, perfectly ready.

    Andrea Greganti next to his clarinets: not a collection, but a continuous dialogue between ingenuity, history and music.
    Not images of an event, but traces of a passage: the knowledge you entrust, the future you listen. The small cicerons guide the audience between music, history and discovery: when the school becomes a living experience.

    Leave a comment

  • "Music before Spotify"

    A new section on the History of Music begins. From Monday 16 March 2026, 21:15 live stream on the official YouTube channel.


    Before the playlists, before streaming, music had already crossed centuries of history, changing the way of thinking, creating and listening to the world. It is from this idea that it is born "Music before Spotify", the new column designed and edited by Marialuisa Veneziano, dedicated to the discovery of the deep roots of music.

    Through an engaging and accessible story, the column will guide the public on a fascinating journey between eras, styles and protagonists who have marked the history of music: from the first forms of written music to the great composers who have revolutionized the musical language.

    Each event will be an opportunity to discover anecdotes, historical contexts, musical instruments and masterpieces that still influence contemporary music. A path that combines cultural dissemination and passion for music, designed to bring the public closer to the beauty and complexity of an extraordinary artistic heritage.

    The column will be broadcast live every Monday at 21:15 on the YouTube channel from Monday, March 16, becoming a meeting space for those who want to know better the history of music and let themselves be guided on a journey between sounds, ideas and great personalities of musical culture.

    Because much before digital platforms and algorithms, music was already an endless story of creativity, insights and artistic revolutions.

    Link to the channel: https://www.youtube.com/@louisemarie8292

    Leave a comment

EnglishenEnglishEnglish